Monday, November 28, 2005

Women ‘get blame for being raped’

I do not know what all the fuss is about. News from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4453820.stm (full text below) tells me that there has been alot of fuss about the findings a poll conducted by Amnesty International.

To me it is all stating the flipping obvious - Women who are scantily dressed, drunk and very flirty stand a higher chance of being raped. That to me is common sense and all those pretending to be shocked or disturbed by the findings should encouraged their wives, girlfriends or daughters to go out scantily dressed, get drunk and flirt with whoever and see what happens. Mind you, they should be adviced to say no should any dickhead try something untoward. Besides that defeats the object of rape - forced encounter. Rape is a very bad thing but should we, in this day and age be suprised at these findings? An old African saying goes - “If you bring home an ant-infested log of wood, you should not be suprised if lizzards pay you a visit”.

People - wise up!!

A third of people believe a woman is partially or completely responsible for being raped if she has behaved flirtatiously, a survey suggests.

The Amnesty International poll of 1,000 people also found over 25% believe she is at least partly to blame if she has worn revealing clothing or been drunk.

Amnesty says the “shocking” findings show government policies are failing.

And the director of public prosecutions told the BBC the report “highlights some areas of real concern”.

Ken Macdonald QC, who is in charge of prosecutions in England and Wales, spoke to BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour.

“The idea that a third of our people think that if a woman flirts she has only herself to blame if she is raped is, I think, quite shocking,” he said.

“These are jury trials. The jury is the community in the courtroom and it is reasonable to suppose the jury brings into the courtroom a lot of the attitudes we have been reading about.”

The Home Office says it has changed the law to try to improve conviction rates.

“We have made a number of changes to the legal system and to how the police and Crown Prosecution Service work, to put victims needs first and to make it easier for cases to get to trial and secure convictions,” a spokesman said.

“We are determined to close the gap between the increasing number of rape cases reported and the low number of convictions.”

However, the Amnesty poll, carried out by ICM, found that most people in Britain had no idea how many women were raped every year in the UK or how few of the cases reported to police resulted in a conviction.

Almost all, 96%, said they either did not know the true extent of rape or thought it was far lower than the true figure. Just 4% thought the number of women raped exceeded 10,000.

The number of recorded rapes of women in 2004/5 was 12,867 - up 4% on the year before - although police estimate that just 15% of rapes come to their attention. Only 6% of reported rapes result in a conviction.

‘Disturbing attitudes’

Amnesty International UK director Kate Allen said the poll, part of its Stop Violence Against Women campaign, had uncovered “disturbing attitudes”.

She said: “It is shocking that so many people will lay the blame for being raped at the feet of women themselves and the government must launch a new drive to counteract this sexist ‘blame culture’.”

The research exposed the scale of public ignorance over rape as well as the “dreadfully low” conviction rates, she added.

“The government has an international duty to prevent this gross human rights violation yet it’s clear that the government’s policies on tackling rape are failing and failing badly.”

Joanna Perry, policy manager at Victim Support, said it was alarming to read that so many people appeared to believe that a woman was responsible for inviting a rape or sexual assault.

‘Devastating effect’

“Rape is an appalling crime and has a devastating effect on victims and those close to them. In other words, nobody asks to be raped,” she added.

And Ruth Hall, from the support group Women Against Rape, criticised “prejudices” in the court system.

“They still put the woman on trial, including her sexual history with other men, which is supposed to be banned and blame the woman for what happened to her and hold her accountable,” she said.

Posted by Jobido in 22:36:39 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Friday, November 11, 2005

Date My Daughter

This is what I read,

        A mother has launched a newspaper appeal urging men to write a 500-word essay   on why they should be allowed to go out with her 24-year-old daughter.

see link……….http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4428602.stm…………and was shocked at first. As a single man who thinks just of one thing, I could not help but ask, “How could she?”

But then again why should she not. The girl needs a man and in the world we are living in, with or without her mothers help it is going to happen sooner or later anyhow so why not vet them. It is very good in principle but then again she said this…………..

She insisted that she was not looking for a husband for her daughter, but just hoped to find someone she could celebrate Christmas with after spending the past few single.

At this point I could not but think of the saying “A dog is not just for Xmas”

At this point I do not know what to think of the woman - Do you?

 

Posted by Jobido in 16:30:28 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Thursday, November 10, 2005

90-Day Terror Bill Defeated

Ha Ha Ha.

The Prime Minister should not be suprised that the 90 day detention bill was defeated. See link”…http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4422086.stm….”

Personaly I do not think it had anything to do with the bill itself but an expression of exasperation by labour back benchers.

What say you?

Posted by Jobido in 11:34:59 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Friday, November 4, 2005

Davis or Cameron - Tory Leadership Contest

Last night 3rd November 2005 -  BBC 1’s Question Time, made very interesting viewing. I am not too interested in Tory Politics since they refused to elect or should I say select a leader of my choice, but the battle to become new Tory leader is heating up.

I personally would have prefered Malcolm Rifkind or Ken Clarke. I never rated either of the Davids, until last night. As I was watching both of them present their cases, it hit me. Davis was old school - what you see is what you get kinda guy. Cameron on the otherhand was new school - razzle, dazzle but lacking in sustance - very much like Tony Blair. He is handsome, charming and potentially full of it - again just like Tony Blair. And quite rightly, Davis pointed out to him that the last thing the Tories need at this point in time is a Blair Wanna-be.

What do you think?

Posted by Jobido in 19:46:17 | Permalink | Comments (1) »